Outputs

Bakken_Test_2 · 3 runs in history · 14 charts available

Complete 2027-02-14 14:36:24
Run #3 · Bakken_Test_2
2-step · Numerical Reservoir 2 Stages
Solving 2027-02-14 14:32:07
Run #2 · Bakken_Test_2
4-step · Example_Frac4 · 5tg
Complete 2027-02-14 11:15:42
Run #1 · Bakken_Test_2
2step · Numerical Reservoir Model
Compare mode: Run #1 vs Run #3 selected. View side-by-side deltas below.
Toggle to see what this view looked like in v8.32

Compare Runs

Run #1 vs Run #3 · same model, different pump schedule

Run #1 · 2stepbaseline
0 half-length (ft) 503 propped 503 ft
Half-length503 ft
Net pressure peak1,520 psi
Fluid efficiency0.83
Avg proppant1.34 lb/gal
Run #3 · 2-step (refined)latest
0 half-length (ft) 412 propped 412 ft
Half-length412 ft (−18%)
Net pressure peak1,690 psi (+11%)
Fluid efficiency0.78 (−6%)
Avg proppant0.62 lb/gal (−54%)
Copilot read of the delta: Run #3 used a leaner pump schedule (lower avg proppant) and higher closure-stress geometry. Net pressure rose 11%, but reduced carrying capacity dropped half-length 18%. If the goal is half-length parity, step Run #3 up to a 3-step schedule with 1.0 lb/gal mid-stage. Want to draft that schedule and queue it as Run #4?